President Obamas Sequestration (80 posts)

|
  • Profile picture of John  Bravo John Bravo said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    He said it, not anyone else.

    “Already some in Congress are trying to undo these automatic spending cuts. My message to them is simple: No,” Mr. Obama said from the White House briefing room Monday evening. “I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending.”

    I’m not sure what all the kerflufle is about Obamas spending cuts. Now that he’s solved that crisis, time for another round of golf.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57329146-503544/obama-pledges-to-veto-effort-to-undo-automatic-spending-cuts/

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Obamas media will not play it this way, Obama can do no wrong in their eyes, and we all pay the price,

  • Profile picture of Groucho Groucho said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Let’s have a little history lesson to start the day: In August, 2011, the country and our economy was threatened by GOP intransigence on the debt ceiling. A deal was reached where a Super Committee from both parties would work out a deal of revenue increases and spending cuts. If the Committee could not reach agreement, automatic tax increases and spending cuts would happen in 2012. Well, naturally the Committee failed, then Congress reneged on Bush Tax Cuts and now we are facing massive cuts in spending. The GOP is cleverly calling this “the Obama Sequestration”. That is interesting when Speaker Boehner said he ‘got 98% of what he wanted’ when the deal was reached. The sequestration will hurt the economy but Republicans don’t care because of their fanatical need to see this administration fail. Pretty sorry bunch.

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Nice spin Groucho, Obama does not have to let this happen, but Im starting to think he wants it, he needs to work with congress to prevent this, but he won’t, he would rather play a blame game, and go golfing, Pretty sorry President

  • Profile picture of think4yourself think4yourself said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Obama backed a lame horse and now the American public will have to pay. He made the naive mistake that he could emotionally manipulate a dysfunctional congress. Obama is a sucker to place any faith in these clowns. And now his blind, deaf, and dumb faith in Congress is going to affect us all. I won’t go as far as saying he did it intentionally knowing it will fail, but I will say that our Populist Pied Piper President again proves that his big talk can’t compensate for his complete divorce from political reality.

    But why should anyone be shocked or surprised. Compromise gets you blackballed by your own party-especially in Congress. Most of these “bright minds” (tongue in cheek) come from secure seat districts. And with low voter turnout, whoever the majority party geographically corronates is the heir apparent to the seat. There is no incentive to be independent. So the more you threaten and blow hot air, the more popular you become within your party. There is no loyalty to the constituents or greater good. There is only loyalty to party.

  • Profile picture of Groucho Groucho said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Mach, I cannot buy that the President wants sequestration, it does him no good politically since he isn’t running again. And he is not alone in blaming Congress, look at the polls.
    think, you are right about one thing (partially): the President thought he could deal with Congress during his first term and was ‘divorced from political reality’. He has since learned and will not make that mistake again. It is on the GOP and they will wear this one, fairly or un-fairly.

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Perhaps some 11th hour deal will be struck, Obama already got two Tax increases this year, should be get more? or should we cut spending, Nancy Peolsi says we dont have a spending problem, right Nancy

  • Profile picture of Groucho Groucho said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Mach, you will not get an argument from me that we need spending cuts, but you should check on the over $1trillion in cuts that have already happened over the last 4 years. Now let’s cut farm subsidies, oil depletion allowances and other forms of corporate welfare before we go to work on school lunch programs.

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    I agree with you on your examples, also, how about we stop throwing Billions away on Solar companies that go bankrupt? ;) Sequester was always intended to apply pressure to both parties. That was the whole point. The goal–according to the same White House Fact Sheet–was to force a deal that included “entitlement and tax reform.” So where are we on that right now?

    The GOP compromised on new taxes in December, but we’ve had nothing on entitlements from the President. In fact, immediately after the GOP gave in on taxes, Obama began demanding more “tax reform” in order to avoid the entitlement cuts that were his half of the bargain. From the SOTU last week, “we can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and the most powerful.”

    Put aside the straw man about seniors shouldering “the entire burden.” The bottom line is simple: Republicans did what they agreed to do to avoid sequester, but the President has tried to weasel his way out of his end of the bargain. If the President is feeling the pressure now, sequester is working as intended.

    http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/02/19/Sequester-Will-Force-Obama-s-Hand-on-Entitlements-Says-The-White-House

  • Profile picture of Groucho Groucho said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Sorry Mach, I will only start reading breitbart when you start watching Rachel Maddow.

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    LOL, well, both have good points at times, but we can agree on that, ;)

  • Profile picture of think4yourself think4yourself said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    Our political system is a lost cause. Bipartisanship (especially in the GOP circles) is a myth and to act on that myth (especially in an election year) gets you blackballed from your own party. Ask Chris Christy. Political gamesmanship is at an all time high and holding Congress to a do or die ultimatum (as Obama did) only squirts fuel on the fire. It almost makes the executive order approach that had the GOP groaning during the SOTU address look preferrable to leaving the fate of our nation to 435 squabbling, beligerent, children. How naive is our President?!?!?!

  • Profile picture of Mach5 Mach5 said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    How naive is our President?

    VERY, there is a book called, “The Amateur”

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Amateur-Barack-Obama-White/product-reviews/1455134775

  • Profile picture of John  Bravo John Bravo said 3 months, 4 weeks ago:

    “but you should check on the over $1trillion in cuts that have already happened over the last 4 years. ”

    Federal Spending
    2008 3.0 trillion
    2009 3.5 trillion
    2010 3.5 trillion
    2011 3.6 trillion
    2012 3.8 trillion
    2013 3.8 trillion (estimated)
    So where are the 1 trillion in spending cuts?? There is almost an addition 1 trillion in spending over and above during the last year of Bush, yet we no longer are fighting the Iraq war and Obama care was passed which lowered healthcare costs. So just where are the spending cuts that got us from 3 trillion in spending to 3.8 trillion in spending?

  • Profile picture of think4yourself think4yourself said 3 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Lowered healthcare costs? JB, I BELIEVE you’re being tongue in cheek on that point????