Pizza Hut’s liberal policies (16 posts)

|
  • Profile picture of limalimamike limalimamike said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Did you know that Pizza Hut does NOT allow it’s delivery drivers to defend themselves when attacked, while carrying out company business (delivering pizzas)?

    A pizza delivery man, whose friend was robbed at gunpoint recently in the neighborhood he was delivering in, armed himself with a fiberglass pole, commonly used in tents.

    He was attacked by 5 TRAYVON MARTINS, who began punching him in the face. He was able to escape with his life, because he got in a few good swipes, and was able to retreat.

    Pizza Hut then demoted the man, as well as slashed his pay for the incident.

    I never did like Pizza Hut, the 1 or 2 times I have tried it in the past. This issue though, guarantees they will never get my business.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/pizza-hut-delivery-driver-allegedly-demoted-for-defending-himself-against-teen-attackers/

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    It is not an unusal company policy that employees not resist a robbery attempt. Give them the money or whatever. Had the driver carried a machine gun, no doubt he’d be another “stand your ground” case.
    Patting this employee on the head for being a hero or something for violating a personnel policy can lead to some tragic consequences.

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Then too, you’re linking The Blaze. Does that mean all facts of the incident are being reported?

  • Profile picture of Lamonster Lamonster said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Brings up some interesting questions. Does a guy working for minimum wage plus tips really have to put his life on the line and follow company policy or face discipline? Is this really much different from being sent in to clean out a pipeline that may have gases built up in it and being overcome by the fumes? What is the company’s responsibility for the employee’s safety?

  • Profile picture of limalimamike limalimamike said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    SIGH
    I assume you know how to use Google..

    He wasn’t being robbed. He was being physically assaulted. So nice to seeyou didnt read the story, don’t know the fact, but question the validity

    What next? Want me you mow your lawn too?

  • Profile picture of Lamonster Lamonster said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Mike, the story says the three who have been arrested have been charged with robbery.

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Last time we ordered a delivery pizza, we left our home phone & the store called us back to confirm. Doesn’t mean the driver wasn’t being set up to be robbed, but did lend credibility that we were legit customers. And the store had a phone number if the driver was robbed or harmed.

  • Profile picture of milemarker milemarker said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Pizza Hut then demoted the man, as well as slashed his pay for the incident. limalimamike

    And unreported by the Blaze, Fox, and about 75 other right wings blogs:

    “He was not demoted, his wages were not lowered and his hours were not cut,” wrote [Pizza Hut representative] Doug Terfehr. “He remains employed with Pizza Hut and the situation is being handled internally with the utmost concern for his well being.”

    Wonder how that happened. I mean, they wouldn’t intentionally report the guy was demoted without asking Pizza Hut, would they? That would be, (gulp) libel! And considering that this story has gone viral without a mention of Pizza Hut’s side of the story in most versions, Pizza Hut might win.

    LLM, championing role models since, um, December 30, 2012, now helping to ruin a business.

  • Profile picture of limalimamike limalimamike said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Of course the talking heads of a large corporation are going to deny that their business model DENIES their employee’s the basic right of being able to protect themselves.

    What retard would knowingly come out and say the opposite, that his company breaks the law?

    Besides, your bible ran the same story

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/31/sam-swicegood-pizza-hut-delivery-man_n_2387915.htm

    Top THAT off with HOPUFF being the ONLY source of the alleged PH comeback

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=sam+swicegood&oq=sam+swicegood&gs_l=hp.3..0.7003.11293.0.11455.13.9.0.4.4.0.120.790.7j2.9.0.les%3B..0.0…1c.1.nw6QLbv_IXA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.cGE&fp=a7e118819f5e1e5b&bpcl=40096503&biw=1600&bih=709

  • Profile picture of milemarker milemarker said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    Dear Mr Personal Responsibility,
    I found several sites that updated their story to include the Pizza Hut response. You look them up. Your manifesto seems not to care. Nor do you. Your lectures on personal responsibility have eluded you.

  • Profile picture of limalimamike limalimamike said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    as of 3AM when I posted, all the stories, except HOPUFF showed what I posted. The only difference between HOPUFF and what I posted was one 2-3 sentence paragraph.

    PFFT you, lecturing on personal responsibility? Wait till I tell your neighbors about you stealing thier WIFI.

    I think your mom is calling you to get your laundry separated, she’s doing a dark load.

  • Profile picture of Lamonster Lamonster said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    MM, your comment made me go back and re-read the story. In it Fox states they are reporting what the employee told them and they also said that the company had yet to make a statement. Hardly seems libelous or even unfair. The employee no doubt felt it was a demotion since the kitchen help, while earning the same wage, would not earn the tips the drivers do.

  • Profile picture of think4yourself think4yourself said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    He may soon find himself unemployed if he’s blabbing his mouth about it. Anybody that works door to door doing anything KNOWS there are risks involved. An event like this does something to a person’s psychological well being. Going back out in ‘the field’ right away is NEVER advisable and posses a liability to the company. There are likely definitive protocols regarding safety for those drivers and we don’t know if he acted within those protocols or not. But if I’m an employer and something happens to my employee and he or she goes to the media and SLAMS the company, his backside is looking for another job!

  • Profile picture of Lamonster Lamonster said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    OK, lots of good questions. First of all, the story did not originate with The Blaze but with the local Fox TV affiliate. When they reported the story they plainly state that Pizza Hut had not yet responded to their numerous requests for a comment. I suspect that if they had waited for that comment before airing the story it would had been very old news. Comments defending one’s position usually come more readily after the other side of the story is out there.

    Secondly, the original Huffpo piece is dated two days after the Fox TV story and at the bottom of the article it notes that the story had been updated to include information from Pizza Hut, information that had been emailed to Huffpo. So, aside from not having Pizza Hut’s version, I don’t know what the original Huffpo piece had in it, and I don’t know whether the email was widely dispersed. So unless you have cards you’re not showing, I don’t see any reason to claim bias or poor reporting ethics against anyone yet.

  • Profile picture of milemarker milemarker said 4 months, 3 weeks ago:

    No. That’s all I have. The difference is that HuffPo updated their story with an answer from Pizza Hut. Neither the original Fox45 story or the Blaze have done so, nor have a great many “shared” versions of the Fox45 story.