In a bizarre onset of amnesia regarding the number of assassinations and attempted assassinations of US Presidents, and threats against them by enemies both foreign and domestic, the National Rifle Association expressed its resentment of the present First Family’s security measures, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Presidents and their families have had special security measures because they have been the targets of political enemies since the founding of this country.

Apparently a schoolroom massacre wasn’t enough to jolt the NRA morality to understand that children are especially vulnerable. The NRA reserved special resentment for two more children – the Obama daughters – in a YouTube campaign and taunted the nation by calling that protection “elitist”.

NRA membership is said to have roared to life as the organization’s leadership insinuated that the children of the President – whose father is the target of every anti-American terrorist on the face of the earth – aren’t worthy of any special protection.

Asked to comment on the Secret Service details assigned to Former First Lady Laura Bush and those of daughters Jenna and Barbara while they were college students, the NRA did not quickly respond to emails.

The gun policies of Obama and the left have increased the membership of the NRA and gun sales more than any advertising campaign ever could.

What were the policies? I understand the President will lay out recommendations on Wednesday, but, again, what were the Obama policies? I heard what the NRA says Obama’s polices are, but I’m still waiting to hear what Obama says his policies are. You make my case for me since you confirmed the NRA sales pitch to be “whatever” Obama’s position is being the key to NRA’s membership success. The funny part is, the only thing Obama has said so far is that doing nothing is not an option. I suspect all the gun grab stuff and the elitist stuff is the part NRA claims is Obama’s position. We’ll know tomorrow. I predict 99% of American gun owners won’t have anything to complain about.

Machine guns are already outlawed for Joe Blows. But don’t let that get in the way of the lies and gross exagerations that you need to make your case against guns. Perhaps you and maggiepoo/demandproof/milemarker could start using dead kids like President Urkel plans to do. Symbolism over substance is the Democratic way.

dril
Catpaw has gone off the deep end. He has been made aware of the fact that the “LAW ABIDING” general population does not have access to automatic weapons….since the 1930′s

Typical liberal that he is, he continues to tell a lie, hoping it will turn into the truth.

Easy, catpaw. No one is calling for a paranoid, inexperienced joe blow to be guarding the school (much less running amok) with a machine gun. Have you tried the decaf? It’s really not bad.

It’s an emotional subject, groucho. The anti-2nd crowd get just as emotional.

I guess I don’t see it Lamont. No one that I know of is calling for banning all guns or shouting they will kill people if they don’t give up their firearms. And let’s face it, there are no conspiracy theories on the gun control side that the gun owners will take over the country. And ‘anti-2nd’ is a little over the top.

Anti-2nd includes those who would attach unwarranted restrictions, not just those who would ban guns all together. Those total-banners would include people like Michael Moore, who could put Lapierre and Alex Jones to shame when it comes to nutty ideas.