Worth A Mention: Gettysburg Address (10 posts)

|
  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 6 months ago:

    The cheek of every American must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat and dish watery utterances of the man who has to be pointed out to intelligent foreigners as the President of the United States.—Chicago “Times”

    The ceremony was rendered ludicrous by…the sallies of that poor President Lincoln…Anyone more dull and commonplace it would not be easy to produce—correspondent’s notes, London “Times”

    It’s a flat failure and the people are disappointed—Abraham Lincoln

    On November19, 1863 at the Gettysburg battlefield, Abraham Lincoln delivered the immortal Gettysburg Address.
    On November 2, Lincoln received an invitation from the committee in charge to attend a dedication ceremony of the cemetery at Gettysburg. The President was almost an afterthought, as the committee did not want the dedication to be a political affair of partisan appeals and Lincoln generally declined speaking engagements as he didn’t have time for them. Some members had doubts “as to his ability to speak upon such a grave and solemn occasion.” The invitation reminded the President that ceremonies would “doubtless be very imposing and solemnly impressive” and “It is the desire that after the oration [of Edward Everett], you, as Chief Executive on the nation, formally set apart these grounds to their sacred use by a few appropriate remarks.”
    The implication was clear to Lincoln: Keep it short. Presidential duties kept Lincoln from putting anything of substance on paper but he probably began composing the speech in his own mind when he did have interludes of privacy. Lincoln did confide to a friend Noah Brooks that his speech was going to be “short, short, short.”
    Lincoln left the White House and boarded a special four-car train to Gettysburg on November 18. Enroute, Lincoln excused himself from conversation with company. “Gentlemen, this is all very pleasant but the people will expect me to say something to them tomorrow, and I must give the matter some thought.” He retreated to his private compartment.
    Lincoln spent the night in the home of Judge David Wills, on the town square. He completed the working draft of his speech before going to bed.
    The next day notables including the President assembled on the square at 10:00 and an hour later the procession moved to Cemetery Hill where the dedication would take place. The bloodiest battle of the Civil War was yet evident. On-going burials were suspended for the day. (The graves were contracted at $1.59 per body.) Buttons, spent bullets, and random equipment still scattered the ground, bearing a mute testimony of the carnage, later to become souvenirs.
    After Lincoln concluded his 272-word speech with what one observer said was “almost shocking brevity” the applause was delayed and then sparse, as if trying to be polite.
    Scathing criticism of the speech was mostly along partisan loyalties. It wasn’t long before editors recognized the speech as outstanding oratory. One remarked it was “deep in feeling, compact in thought and expression, and tasteful and elegant in every word and comma.” Another said it was “the right thing in the right place, and a perfect thing in every respect.”
    In a letter to Lincoln the next day Edward Everett wrote “I should be glad if I could flatter myself that I came as near the central idea of the occasion, in two hours, as you did in two minutes.” At his request, Lincoln wrote the address and gave it Everett. He wrote about six such copies, and there are at least five “original” copies of the Gettysburg Address in collections. The copy Lincoln composed for the speech is in the Congressional Library. The address is also inscribed on the Lincoln Memorial.

  • Profile picture of Lamonster Lamonster said 6 months ago:

    Sorry for going off topic, catpaw, but your history threads seem to be the only place safe from deletion. Are we becoming so abrasive in our comments that we have to lose entire threads?

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 6 months ago:

    Well, historical facts are historical facts, and one wouldn’t expect them to be disputed. You might be surprised how often they are. Unkind comments are going to pop up, whatever the topic.
    And I hate to admit it, but I am guilty of letting my emotions over rule even tempered comments a few times.
    There’s a line in the movie “Quo Vadis” that has Nero saying, “Women shouldn’t judge other women; they don’t have the glands for it.” Perhaps that logic can be applied to people judging people. : )

  • Profile picture of SWVoice SWVoice said 6 months ago:

    “Well, historical facts are historical facts”
    ==================================
    Cat, I hate to bust your bubble, because I understand your love of history, but
    it’s not called HIS Story (history) for no reason. I would venture to guess that about
    25% of recorded history is BS. Really, just His Story. How the powers that be, men,
    wanted it recorded. Especially the Catholic Church men and Kings.

  • Profile picture of John  Bravo John Bravo said 6 months ago:

    Nice job Cat. I bet you didn’t think you were writing a Catholic bashing thread. :)

    Its unfortunate politicians on both sides can’t or won’t engage in “almost shocking brevity”.

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 6 months ago:

    The HIS story cynicism reminds of the “victors write the history” slur that I often hear. Those versions do not survive. Somewhere there is a dedicated researcher who patiently gets the facts. Gordon Prange devoted something like 37 years uncovering the events leading to Pearl Harbor. William Shirer spent about 20 years getting the facts of Nazi Germany. A passion for history is also a passion for truth.
    After reading Bill O’Reilly’s “Killing Lincoln” I commented that there were facts in the book not mentioned in Grant’s memiors. This can change a perspective of an event.
    I would surmise that if one is astute enough to recognize history is recorded according to churchs and kings, then surely he must have studied something that presented a clarified truth to come to that conclusion.
    On the flipside of “his story” and “victors writing history” there is “history will be the judge” which is something reserved for later generations.

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 6 months ago:

    How the Gettysburg Address bashes Catholics is a connection I don’t comprehend.
    If you’re speaking of what I submitted about Elizabeth I, catholicism and protestism in those times were more political institutions than religious ones. I’ve commented in the past that any institution concieved by the human mind has its elements of hypocrisy. Some shortcomings are more glaring than others. It shouldn’t be a surprise that acting on them can lead to tragic consequences.

  • Profile picture of John  Bravo John Bravo said 6 months ago:

    I was just commenting on how this blog went from the topic of the best address ever uttered by a President to Catholic bashing, all in less than seven degrees of Kevin Bacon.

  • Profile picture of SWVoice SWVoice said 6 months ago:

    John and Cat, I wasn’t bashing Catholics. I R one. But I stand by my words. A lot of re-writing has gone on over the years, maybe not so much in more recent centuries, but, earlier. Sorry if I got off topic.That happens often on here.
    I wasn’t referring to any previous entries other than Cat’s “historical facts are historical facts”.

  • Profile picture of catpaw catpaw said 6 months ago:

    Understood, JB, I get what you were saying. And I can accept it with a sense of humor. Off-topic doesn’t upset me, so I appreciate the apology but no harm no foul.

    Anyway, as long as the topic is, there’s alot of detail not mentioned. Lincoln, of course, was under the strain of his office, the war, his unrelenting critics, and it’s a wonder he accepted this particular invitation. The bulk of the crowd at the dedication had a loved one buried in the new cemetery. Lincoln was challenged to explain to these people in a few words just what did it mean to lose a son, sibling, or husband on the battlefield, the purpose of it all. No matter how worthy the cause or how heroic the sacrifice, they are dead nonetheless. Eulogies are little consolation to the bereaved, and Lincoln says as much in his speech. He concludes his speech with charging the living to give the dead a purpose for their ultimate sacrifice.